Replying to @A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
I will continue to pray for Slate to not completely suck. There's a "smart" module that has a cellular modem, but it's something you have to opt into and pay for it.

Alt account of @Badabinski
Just a sweaty nerd interested in software, home automation, emotional issues, and polite discourse about all of the above.
Replying to @A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
I will continue to pray for Slate to not completely suck. There's a "smart" module that has a cellular modem, but it's something you have to opt into and pay for it.
Replying to @wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
Only possible AI thing I see is .zed in the .gitignore, but that's not an indicator of LLM usage. Plenty of people use zed with all AI features disabled.
Replying to @omniman@anarchist.nexus
Try putting two spaces are the end of the line, or leave a blank line between each line.
two spaces at the end
of the line test.
blank line
test.
Replying to @Sandbar_Trekker@piefed.zip
Man, they need to hold another vote to get the verbiage of this cleared up.
Replying to @beep@piefed.world
The title of this post is incorrect. They are not banning cryptocurrency projects. See this message for why: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pulls/1254#issuecomment-19923979
edit: man, I have no idea anymore.
Codeberg.orgProposal for Assembly 2026: Disallow cryptocurrency projectsContext:
- https://forum.codeberg.org/d/82-taking-a-stance-against-cryptocurrency
- https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/794
- https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2184