← Back to post

Edit history

Most recent

You don’t really need sources, we all know AI tends to hallucinate when presented with a problem they can’t solve.
So far I’ve only read about 1 example of a problem that an AI may have solved. All the rest are without details and are not confirmed in any way.

Remember AI companies are huge on propaganda for their technology, but not so big on admitting the shortcomings.

Edit:
Changed the use of the word evidence to sources, because apparently people misunderstood it.

Edited

You don’t really need evidence, we all know AI tends to hallucinate when presented with a problem they can’t solve.
So far I’ve only read about 1 example of a problem that an AI may have solved. All the rest are without details and are not confirmed in any way.

Remember AI companies are huge on propaganda for their technology, but not so big on admitting the shortcomings.

Edited

You don’t really need evidence, we all know AI tends to hallucinate when presented with a problem they can’t solve.
So far I’ve only read about 1 example of a problem that an AI may have solved. All the rest are without details and are not confirmed.

Original

You don’t need evidence, we all know AI tends to hallucinate when presented with a problem they can’t solve.
So far I’ve only read about 1 example of a problem that an AI may have solved. All the rest are without details and are not confirmed.