Jhex

Agreed… although this still leaves the horrible environmental effects and losing any kind of ownership ofethe code

But solely in terms of using “ai” as a tool, it is a sensible approach

maybe if the president of the USA weren’t a raging child rapist…

after the regulatory “donations” have been dispersed

This has “what could go wrong?” written all over it

more “thoughts and prayers”

I specifically left because Spotify would not stop pushing drooling idiot Joe Rogan… and that is a podcast Spotify funds

same here

Seems it worked.

How? who thinks “Meta“ is ok on privacy today?

it’s called the Baader Meinhof effect or frequency illusion

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequency_illusion?wprov=sf…

trashy cars pretending to be a luxury brand

Exactly the type of person I’d expect behind any AI initiative

quit your nonsense! it’s clear we already have AGI and this is not a grifters’ bubble!

yeap, you are 100% correct

Plus, it’s not anecdotal AND goes beyond your statement.

Through the years and statistical analysis, it has been proven that picking stock, even by professionals is still mostly luck. I think analysts have ran out of ridiculous examples of animals picking stock randomly and still coming on top in a long enough time period.

So if even the “professionals” are not really doing much, why would any individual nurture the thought that THEY could do better?

unwall.app/…/any-monkey-can-beat-the-market/

npr.org/…/housecat-beats-investors-in-stock-marke…

acquirersmultiple.com/…/daniel-kahneman-the-illus…

who can afford the best analysts and mathematical models on top of their market influence.

Why bother with that when you can just do a little inside trading during the next child raping party?