richmondez

Disagree, the agentic LLM use does not have any real agency of its own, the user giving it access and a request and not preventing the possible illegal ways it could fulfill that request and entirely on the user for being ignorant and irresponsible trying to shift work onto a system with chaotic behavior.

You have selected “regicide”. If you know the name of the king or queen being murdered, press 1…

I get doing things because you can, that doesn’t mean it’s not wholly unsuited to the task and massive over kill that you only use because either 1. It’s self hosted so you are already paying for it or 2. It’s super cheap. You likely wouldn’t entertain such a set up if you were paying the true price for training and running the models.

I would say no, because even physical devices you purchase have to come with subscription plans or in some way talk back to the manufacturers servers that isn’t in your interest.

Maybe but even there there are limits on how much they will be willing to spend for junior level programming no matter how much of a ship fast fix broken methodology they adopt.

The public assumption that AI can’t tell fact from fiction and confidently makes stuff up doesn’t seem at odds with them being able to spin a good yarn.

You managed to set up that tech stack but needed an agent with unrestricted access to figure out the time was wrong 😂

There are skill issues and a lack of imagination here but it’s not from people dismissing the use of LLM…

Capitalism for me but not for thee. Arent state enforced monopolies more of a communist thing though?

Seems the proof more or less already existed and the LLM helped the researchers find it and demonstrate it applied to the problem they were researching? Basically doing grunt work literature searches that grad students might have done in the past.

Hasn’t the output from LLM already been ruled ineligible for copyright protection?