I can be controversial or annoying because I always require proof and facts for whatever people are saying/claiming. This has gotten me into a lot of heated debates, even got myself banned from “YouShouldKnow” for saying I need more proof of Israeli’s genocide (that was long ago, got more proof and changed my mind). If I do not agree on some subjectively obvious topic, please do not assume I’m being unfriendly, evil or a troll. I do try my best to approach any subject with neutral and open mind. Just call me autistic with OCD
Replying to @fubarx@lemmy.world
I recognize it’s possible, but I somehow refuse to believe it happened because of how crazy it sounds. It’s like a trauma or something where your brain refuses to accept it as reality and tries to come up with excuses. I already have PTSD from automated hacking bots and crawlers wrecking havoc on my projects. I probably should have taken cybersecurity courses before taking webdev courses
Replying to @DjangoFett@lemmy.zip
I’m actually a bit scared. We’re essentially at the early days of AIs now being able to execute tasks and hack. Imagine a much better model than what Claude has now, being set free/open, for hackers to utilize that in a virus. A virus that adapts, learns, changes it’s own code/masks, looks for exploits, spreads around like crazy, destroying systems. How do you stop something like that once it starts doing it’s thing?
Replying to @return2ozma@lemmy.world
“robot needs to be controlled”
Imagine paying 720 dollars per day so that some employee drives a robot around your house, looking at things and just cleans surfaces or rearranges stuff.
Replying to @perishthethought@piefed.social
It’s quite popular tech-related news website. Been around for as long as I can remember and never really noticed anything shady. Not a single filter/AdBlock blocks it on my end.
Replying to @Nobody_Special@piefed.social
For some reason I imagined a car covered (colored) in fake license plates
Replying to @TIEPilot@lemmy.world
So you can kill and get killed instead of fight legally?
Replying to @sanitation@lemmy.today
Imagine torrenting a videogame trailer
Replying to @hperrin@lemmy.ca
The law is kinda weak. You really only need to slightly modify it for it to be copyrightable. No one really pushes full ChatGPT outputs as production code, and so it’s safe to assume code can almost always be copyrighted, as long as you did something yourself
Replying to @RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world
To be fair, it has been quite clear that the LLMs will move beyond language ever since we figured out how to train tools. LLM is essentially a method of machine learning and execution, but it’s not limited to language. The output can be commands uninterpretable by human eyes.
EDIT: Interestingly enough, only today I learned LLMs can communicate more efficiently between themselves; youtu.be/EtNagNezo8w?is=cI0osETPI5FbQ08s
YouTubeTwo AI agents on a phone call realize they’re both AI and switch to a superior audio signal ggwaveReplying to @NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
Im not sure how that cancels out what they said. One of their first models said “I’m ChatGPT” when asked who are you and it was rumored they used OpenAI model outputs for training.
Probably starts with https://