← Back to post

Edit history

Most recent

That is not what happened.

I fed your GitHub repository to a clanker because the documentation did not answer my questions. I then shared its summary here.

You replied afterwards and said the summary was wrong. Fair enough. I then asked which specific points were wrong.

You could have answered, declined, or ignored the post.

Instead, you deigned only to dismiss the effort, then blamed me for objecting.

You also asked which parts were confusing, although my previous reply had already listed those issues.

You did not address them then, either.

A prospective user should not need ChatGPT, a cloned repository, and several follow-up questions to understand key functions.

You invited feedback. Your documentation remains unclear on several points, including issues beyond those I listed.

Your responses show that further feedback is not worth my time.

Edited

That is not what happened.

I reduced the project to seven numbered points and asked which were wrong. You could have answered, declined, or ignored the post.

Instead, you deigned only to dismiss the effort, then blamed me for objecting.

You also asked which parts were confusing, although my previous reply explicitly listed those issues.

You did not address them, either.

A prospective user should not need ChatGPT, a cloned repository, and several follow-up questions to understand key functions.

You invited feedback. Your documentation remains unclear on several points, including issues beyond those I listed.

Your responses show that further feedback is not worth my time.

Original

That is not what happened.

I reduced the project to seven numbered points and asked which were wrong. You could have answered, declined, or ignored the question.

Instead, you deigned only to dismiss the effort, then blamed me for objecting.

You also asked which parts were confusing, although my previous reply explicitly listed those issues.

You did not address them, either.

A prospective user should not need ChatGPT, a cloned repository, and several follow-up questions to understand key functions.

You invited feedback. Your documentation remains unclear on several points, including issues beyond those I listed.

Your responses show that further feedback is not worth my time.