No, if you mean 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255, that is a /16 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.255 is a /24 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.7 is a /29
I was a little glib in my initial response. You really don’t want to start your definition in the middle of a subnet.
I would set it up so your first group of /29 would be 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.7
Second would be 192.168.0.8 - 192.168.0.15 (192.168.0.8/29)
Third would be 192.168.0.16 - 192.168.0.23 (192.168.0.16/29)
And so on.
No, if you mean 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255, that is a /16 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.255 is a /24 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.7 is a /29
I was a little glib in my initial response. You really don’t want to start your definition in the middle of a subnet.
I would set it up so your first group of /29 would be 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.7
Second would be 192.168.0.8 - 192.168.0.15 (192.168.0.8/29)
Third would be 192.168.0.16 - 192.168.0.23 (192.168.0.6/29)
And so on.
No, if you mean 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255, that is a /16 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.255 is a /24 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.7 is a /29
I was a little glib in my initial response. You really don’t want to start your subnet in the middle of a boundary.
I would set it up so your first group of /29 would be 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.7
Second would be 192.168.0.8 - 192.168.0.15 (192.168.0.8/29)
Third would be 192.168.0.16 - 192.168.0.23 (192.168.0.6/29)
And so on.