Replying to @dgriffith@aussie.zone
i think the big issue is asymmetry. they charge at 3C, but they discharge at 8C. so you need the significantly overbuild.
Replying to @dgriffith@aussie.zone
i think the big issue is asymmetry. they charge at 3C, but they discharge at 8C. so you need the significantly overbuild.
Replying to @Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
one is energy density, the other is power density.
Replying to @Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
i think bmw was working on something like that.
Replying to @nyan@lemmy.cafe
from other comments it seems the energy density of batteries currently on the market is about 2/3rds that of lithium cells.
there’s also the asymmetry to worry about: with a max discharge rate of 8C but a charge rate of 3C there could potentially be limits on regen braking. if i’m understanding it correctly, sodium cells degrade quickly at higher charge rates.
Replying to @DahGangalang@infosec.pub
idk about that, the regularly cited reason Na-ion batteries are mainly being looked at for grid storage rather than vehicle applications is their bad Wh/l and W/kg numbers compared to Li-ion. the table in the Na-ion article seems to use “1000W/kg” without a source, and it shows lithium as being about a third of that even though the Li-ion article quotes figures up to 10kW/kg.
seems the editors of the two articles aren’t cross-checking eachother.
Replying to @Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
according to their product page, the charge rate for a single cell seems to max out at 3C, which could be a pretty big obstacle to grid-scale deployment. unless that’s a problem that can be fixed with a different arrangement; i’m not too up on how to build batteries.
Replying to @pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
i configured dyndns in my router and have it forward all traffic to a gateway vm running nginx and fail2ban. every service is on a subdomain so any attempt to fetch things from the main name gets banned.
Replying to @SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
no but i’m not talking about me. i’m talking about tyler, 27, who just gets a new phone and doesn’t care about whatever accounts the old one had, so he throws it away and now the parts are available at a repair shop.
Replying to @SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
what if the phone is broken and has been disassembled?
Replying to @SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
sure but what if you buy one for parts?
Replying to @GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
i’m perfectly fine with buying third-party components.
Replying to @GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
…but only if you buy the parts new.
Replying to @GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
the same apple that locks individual parts of devices to user accounts so that they can’t be used for repair?
Replying to @shininghero@pawb.social
…but they’re building a fleet truck…?
Replying to @qaz@lemmy.world
did you click the link? did you read the thread? no worries, i will help you.
exhibit a, the official response:
exhibit b, the post in question:
Edit:
and just for good measure, the actual text of the ToS, with the change highlighted:
You must not share any content that’s expressing hate or encouraging violence towards a person or group for any reason. We also explicitly do not tolerate:
- Discriminatory behaviour towards and promoting oppression, especially of marginalized groups on grounds of ethnicity, gender, disability, nationality, education, age, and religion.
- Violent nationalist propaganda, Nazi symbolism or promoting the ideology of National Socialism.
- Mobbing, stalking, doxxing (exposing someone’s personal information), brigading (inciting a group to spam a specific place for any reason), threatening and harassment, as well as encouraging others to do those things.
- Insults, discriminatory jokes, sexualized comments and other unwanted sexual attention.
- Sexually obscene content, including content involving the exploitation or sexualization of minors.
- Content that’s glorifying violence; that includes any violent material without a proper content warning.
- Content that harms the reputation of Codeberg, such as cryptocurrency related projects.
Replying to @E_coli42@lemmy.world
no they didn’t. it’s right there in the thread; they reserve the right to remove any project that “damages the reputation of codeberg”, with crypto scams listed as an example.
Replying to @stumu415@lemmy.zip
wow, a whole 0.2% of their revenue? that’s gotta sting.