silverpill

@julian Oh, that's disappointing. I was hoping for the opportunity to discuss interaction policies with a broader community.

It's unfortunate that the discussion moves behind closed doors and to bigtech platforms instead.

@julian Hello, are you still working on interactionPolicy FEP?

Updating FEP-5219: Groups and permissions: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/908

I added two flags that indicate whether a group is private, semi-private or public: canFollow and canParticipate. These flags are similar to ones used in interactionPolicy pattern but I think interaction policies don't scale well.

There is now a thread on SocialHub if you prefer it for FEP discussions: https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/fep-5219-groups-and-permissions/8855

#fep_5219

@sun Mitra doesn't support scopes, but I can start adding them if needed.

I saw your FEP draft, by the way. Is it ready for review?

@sun @pernia @haruspex Awesome, thank you!

@sun @pernia @haruspex It still returns 401 for any activity

@sun @pernia @haruspex It doesn't require authorized fetch

@sun @pernia @haruspex No, I think it is a useful feature - you can see when a new market is created.

@sun I can't follow @haruspex, the server returns 401

@pernia

@sendpaws Correct - the censorship infrastructure has not been dismantled and another major wave is likely coming. The author even recognizes that LLMs will make it much worse than the previous one.

But everyone is still using centralized platforms like there is no tomorrow.

@admin

>It runs on software such as Pleroma, Misskey, and Mitra — each different, all connected.

At long last, an organization that doesn't try to cancel me. How do I join?

@streamsgarden

Compatibility patches are being prepared for streams and hubzilla - the only other projects which support the conversational fediverse.

You're quick to forget that someone painstakingly documented conversation containers, implemented them and spent two years promoting the feature to other developers.

No good deed goes unpunished

@liaizon I'll be the last one to implement them. Adding fake moderation features is against the principles of Mitra project.

@liaizon

I know but it should also display a link.

If "post pending" is confusing I can remove it.

@potatomeow This is because you're on Mastodon

@mobilizon Lemmy implements FEP-1b12. My software also supports this FEP so I can try from here too but I've never seen Mobilizon's Group in the wild.

Mastodon 4.7 beta supports FEP-521a: Representing actor's public keys and FEP-8b32: Object Integrity Proofs (inbound only for now)

I also see FEP-8967: Generating link previews for attached links in the changelog.

It looks like FEP process is actually working?

RE: https://mastodon.social/users/MastodonEngineering/statuses/117071692327950548

@phnt @icedquinn mitra builds with 1.85 - the version of rustc that is shipped with debian stable. There is a lot of garbage in the ecosystem that requires latest rust but if you know how to navigate it you can build complex software with conservative requirements.

@julian @z9mb1 There are already two Rust frameworks...
Also some parts of the code look very familiar to me, which is not surprising given that the project is vibe coded (= plagiarized).

@iftas @smallcircles

@julian @skavish Yes, an FEP can cover a non-technical topic too.