PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

sanitation@sanitation@lemmy.today
⁨2⁩d

AI agents aren’t legally responsible for any harm that they cause, experts say. So who is?

www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/aug/13/ai-agents-arent-legally-responsible-for-any-harm-that-they-cause-experts-say-so-who-is
3310376
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
fubarx@fubarx@lemmy.world
⁨2⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

You rolled a bowling ball down a hill. It struck a few cars on the way and went through a house and killed their pet. Guess who would be held responsible? You or the bowling ball manufacturer?

What if the bowling ball was really shiny and worth $100B? Should it make a difference?

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
GreenBeard@GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
⁨2⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

If I make a gun that actively chooses to kill people, I didn’t build a gun and that whole argument falls apart. I’d hold everyone from the CEO to the janitor accountable.

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Abyssian@Abyssian@lemmy.world
⁨1⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

If you make a gun… you didn’t make it? o_O

⁨Aug⁩ ⁨13⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨08:53⁩en
1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
GreenBeard@GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
⁨1⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

That’s not a gun. That’s an autonomous killing device. The only gun that ever killed people of its own free will was the STEN gun. If you make something that kills without human intent, that’s not a gun anymore.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs