Replying to @ayyy@sh.itjust.works
Hanlon’s razor

Replying to @ayyy@sh.itjust.works
Hanlon’s razor
Replying to @ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world
Ah what the heck after the 5th time reloading it did work lol
Replying to @Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
Sorry for ranting lol. But it pisses me off especially when it comes from science news. Elsevier and sciencedirect is another service that blocks me, and I’m not even using a VPN or super secure browser.
Soon more and more webpages will only work with “authentic Chrome” or some shit, and block all VPNs. And then soon you’ll have to log into chrome. And that will create a permanent link with your government ID. I’m just tired of this predictable evil trajectory of technology. The internet was supposed to destroy tyranny, not join it!
Replying to @benjirenji@slrpnk.net
Cute.
Replying to @Sepia@mander.xyz
What are the chances this is some misguided customer support tool or someone screwing up?
I’d think if this was a deliberate attempt for hacking they’d at least have a proper authentication challenge. You wouldn’t want your enemies to have access to your toys too. No matter how socialist you are haha.
Replying to @shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
If it’s cheap and abundant enough you can have overcapacity and it easily lasts 30 years - which apparently is an important breakpoint for infrastructure project funding.
Replying to @Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
Probably numbers for the raw cell though, not the balancing and cooling which could make sodium a bit more competitive.
Interesting, but from what I understand limited charging would only be a problem if you do not have large enough battery capacity. So for heavier vehicles with larger capacity this might not matter much.
PS: This video about the CATL NaFePO4 battery also mentions a “half sodium half lithium” battery pack for cars to combine the best of both.
YouTubeThis Battery Doesn't Need Lithium and It Just Hit Mass ProductionReplying to @UnfairUtan@lemmy.world
Afaik they are mostly intended for large scale grid storage where weight doesn’t matter. Or even efficiency, you can just add more super cheap solar panels. Their biggest advantage is longer lifespan though that makes them viable as a infrastructure project. Price and longevity is really all that matters for grid storage.
So they are a bit heavier than lithium ion batteries but could still work for many applications. Could be great for a solar powered catamaran for example. They are I think safer too.
PS: Actually I was thinking off the “sodium iron pyrophosphate (NFPP)” battery from CATL, but I think they are comparable.
Replying to @Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
Archive link: archive.ph/Xe3BU
interestingengineering.com/…/unigrid-sodium-ion-b…
This page couldn’t load
Reload to try again, or go back.
What is this shit? The page loads perfectly, then goes blank. They just fucking pretend to be broken because of some ad blocker or something. Why is the internet getting worse all the time. I don’t want you fucking layout, share buttons and other garbage.
Replying to @db2@lemmy.world
Woah, did you get this idea from Frank Herbert’s ConSentiency / BuSab novels?
There recently was a story about clothes made from living fungi that can kind of self repair. Made me think of that again, such bioengineered types of material could be great for carpets or furniture too, if they were self cleaning and automatically regenerate any small damage.
Replying to @acosmichippo@lemmy.world
They deserve to make some money from it. Mostly the original researchers that is. They had their wages to do their fucking job researching shit. Maybe we should have a kind of UN bonus system to reward outstanding research.
These companies take the research and all that it’s build on and use it for free to develop it into a product. Do a good job growing and selling them then, make money. But laws protecting them to create an artificial monopoly is unethical.
Replying to @unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
I see now way this could possibly go wrong. These genes already come from the wild. And these plants would spend lots of the energy they produce on glowing, which is cool for us but a severe disadvantage in the wild. And deer would probably think it’s hilarious to turn glowing plant into glowing poo.
It is possible they’d evolve some some kind of symbiotic relationship with animals over time. Small predatory animals like cats or ferrets might love to hunt in their light and keep them from getting eaten.
Replying to @benjirenji@slrpnk.net
<actual attempt at making real world solarpunk>
Faux! Chinese people bad!
Replying to @SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
Could work well enough? The idea is that you don’t need to fully “light up” a street. See the photo here: www.isaaa.org/kc/cropbiotechupdate/…/default.asp?…
Especially if they further engineer brushes or small trees, like to glow strongest for a few hours after sundown. From my napkin math plants achieve something from 1% to 5% efficiency in converting sunlight into calories / chemical energy. I think that should be enough to provide low illumination to a small area around them.
Right now in order to put up an energy efficient streetlamp you need to dig in the earth to bury a cable (or have a big ass solar panel on top) and rely on high technology LED energy efficient lights. Now imagine just having to plant a seed. Such advanced biotechnology isn’t just a question of environmentalism and resource efficiency, it also has the potential to democratize the technology needed to have higher quality of life anywhere on earth. Imho universities should be making such useful seeds that can replace complex industry supply chains and make them available for free.
Crop Biotech UpdateExhibition Features Gene-edited Glowing Plants in ChinaGene-edited glowing plants were one of the highlights of the 2026 Garden Conference x Garden Collection Design Week held on April 17-19, 2026, at Suzhou International Expo Center in China. The glowing plants were showcased by Magicpen Bio, a China-based startup focused on research and development of gene-edited glowing plants.Replying to @fizzle@quokk.au
Yes it is dark:
This is intended to handle the increase of calls that are related to one incident, so callers get automatically routed to an AI agent who asks if they are calling regarding the incident. If the answer is yes, then callers can receive information or updates, and if it’s no, then the callers are transferred to a human.
This combats multitudes of calls piling up and taking longer time to potentially answer an emergency call. The OPCD said the AI will not be used to handle emergency calls, only to direct such calls to a human dispatcher.
Basically they are testing this to see if they can handle multiple callers to keep the lines and operators open for new emergencies. They are testing and not being irresponsible.
What is dark about this is that nobody even read the fucking article but jumps to conclusion on the fucking clickbait headline. We are becoming a global civilization of programmed morons where you only have to hit the right trigger word and everyone goes stupid.
Replying to @zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
They are not influenced by culture or religion. Correct?
No
Replying to @zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
Apparently what I’m writing here is very easy to misunderstand. Obviously what I meant is what parents wish for their children - and it’s not sex work to pay the bills.
It is fundamental human nature and psychology to see sex and sex work as something not mundane. It carries special consequences and emotions and meaning. This has nothing to do with culture or religion and I very much doubt it can be changed through culture. Nor should it it be changed because of some “principle” you think is more important. It’s baked into us through millions of years of evolution and sexual selection. You could even call it one of the fundamental forces of life. A social forces that shaped every part of our culture, stories, politics.
I’m all for decriminalizing sex work and respecting people, but most sex workers would prefer to work in other fields if it wasn’t so profitable or they weren’t so desperate. Money is power and if you pay someone to do something it can be a form of coercion.
Personally I see being able to generate pornography and eventually replace sex work through artificial means as a fundamental advance in humanity’s ethical evolution. Similar to artificial meat and an end to slaughtering animals to eat them. A base desire that we can replace through technological means.
en.wikipedia.orgSexual selection - WikipediaReplying to @zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
Yes, promotional mascots. Also maybe portable toilet cleaners. Roadkill collector? Crime scene cleaners? Broadcaster definitely. Restroom attendant also.
But seriously, do you think this is a controversial view? Do you think parents want (EDIT: their adult) children or friends to have to do sex work? Would anybody go “oh wow I’m so proud of you”? I do not think so. So lowering the demand and therefor supply pressure is overall a societal good.
Replying to @zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
You honestly don’t believe that there are sex workers who are relying on their job for a paycheck? Why?
No human should have to do sex work …