BlaestEgnen

I have no clue how common adblock is among YouTube users, but there’s probably a bigger chunk of pornhub viewers on mobile.

Pornhub is also in an unique place, given a lot of advertisers won’t advertise there. Pushing prices down, but simultaneously a different set of advertisers can only advertise there. Pushing the price up. I have absolutely no clue whether or not pornhub charge more per ad view than Google ad services on average

I’ve never seen that, which freaking websites only works in Chromium?

I’ve seen glorious corporate interfaces, only functioning in Microsoft Explorer. But only Chromium?

The same should apply to companies who build AI, if it’s used to hack someone or make CSAM.

Only if they host the model, if it’s a self hosted open source model, the entity hosting the model should be held accountable

Also to keep your analogy going, if I tell you how to make a grenade. You then go out to buy supplies, make the grenade and blow up your neighbour, should I be held accountable for sharing knowledgea? Because I’m yet to hear about anyone getting into trouble for distributing the anarchist’s cookbook

You’re not going to context hack complexity, every time you summarise something and pass it onto the next agent. You’re losing complexity.

We’re going to get some massive models with incredible context, but AGI requires models to never hallucinate. Even when the complexity requires more context than it has available, which is not feasible

This is the primary paper I reference.

arxiv.org/pdf/2507.07505

Vishal Sikka, advisory board member of BMW. Recommended to Stanford by Marvin Minsky, one of his professors were John McCarty. And I must stand corrected, he has a PHD of computer sciences, not Math as I remembered it as.

Varin Sikka is his son, co author of the paper and based on Stanford’s site an undergraduate. profiles.stanford.edu/363374

Vishal has an AI based company himself, so there might be some personal reasons for why he’d advocate for using what AIs capable of rather than chasing an impossible (from his perspective) to hit milestone

We have math PHDs with proofs current LLMs can’t become AGI, because they’ll always have a context issue

Just because we’re on the echo chamber of Reddit rejects, doesn’t equal Reddit being minuscule.

Reddit is still living with a huge base of users.

Yep, most people would not understand Machine Learning or Big Data analysis generally being AI, so just market your product by the sub category and you don’t have to deal with the expectancy of GenAI

I honestly think it would do a lot if all sorting algorithms were made open source.

We would quite quickly have mapped out how their algorithms work and which companies are the most predatory

Given EU have created laws to require physical knobs for key features, I’d imagine this will be stopped as well.

BMW is the brand that tests for profit initiatives to see if they stick, I recall them being reported to attempt seated heating as a subscription a few years back

A human brain model would never get us to a super computer, which is their intended goal.

Our brains have about one exaflop of processing. The NVidia B300 has 15 petaflops of processing. Corresponding to 0.015 exa, you’d need 66 of the strongest GPUs on the market to match the processing power of one human brain.

That’s before considering context, current estimations would put the human brain at 2.5 petabytes of storage. The former B300 has 288 gigabytes of VRAM. Corresponding to 0.000288 of one human brain, the earlier expectation of 66 landing flat at 0.019 the storage of a human brain.

Can arguments be made not all brain capacity is at VRAM at all times? Most likely. But context windows is the primary bottleneck, not compute

Our brains are absolute monsters, we’d gain more from understanding how we can have this powerful of a machine on so little space. The bigger breakthrough would be brainbased processing of software, but I’ve not heard of anyone going that route - Probably because it’s not feasible

Although simulations agree with you, that LLM powered agentic frameworks are more efficient than human CEOs at optimising a company. They’re also incapable of feelings, making the board of directors fire them in the majority of simulations, for being too cynical

Replacing CEOs with agentic LLMs, is not a benefit for the workers. Far from it, unless you prefer an openly psychopathic CEO

There’s also laws in place if you’re in focus, that requires permission.

Sure I can take a picture of a plaza and if you happen to be on that photo, that’s bad luck. But I can’t zoom in on you garbling down a spinach roll.

For your scenario of going too close and forcing their way to film voyeur stuff, sounds like harassment

As long as blue ray discs are released, there’ll be webshops selling them

For digital media, pirating increases the number of sales

Why would you make it harder than it is?

libre office and you got an open source Office suite

Gravity walking is the missing link, lift your foot and let gravity pull it down. You’ll be going down almost running and it takes barely any energy.

It’s best in places without other humans, as you’re basically a locomotive and it takes time to slow down

Now we just need to proof they’ve copied the files onto a second hard drive, so they own two copies

If we’re gonna keep it as a copyright issue, I think people are mostly mad they’re not able to reprint the books themselves if they wanted to. We’re not speaking from a copyright position