The AI Gigafactories call is now open.

Today, we launched a call for tenders to establish up to 7 AI Gigafactories across Europe, boosting Europe’s computing capacity and unlocking more than €30 billion in investment.

I am pleased to see Member States, industry, and the Commission coming together to build these facilities, which are key to strengthening our technological sovereignty.

This is a milestone for Europe in becoming an AI Continent.

link.europa.eu/qGDhv3

EU launches AI Gigafactories call to boost Europe's computing capacity and unlock more than €30 billion in investment
ALT
en

Replying to @⁨raccoon@hollow.raccoon.quest⁩

@HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu
Not to mention the fact that this will make computer hardware components prices go further up, don't you realize that people are struggling to get their hands on computer parts for personal use because of ai datacenter?
We should be able to afford our own hardware, not rent cloud systems that require a connection to work.
This is horrible for so many reasons.

Replying to @⁨ansuz@gts.cryptography.dog⁩

@ansuz @engineer @danielquinn @HennaVirkkunen

I have an idea here: We *do* need to get off the Amerikaanse bigtech cloud. Let's build datacentres, but let's design them so they're (a) _efficient_ and (b) _flexible_, so when we finally get 'round to actually building them (and may it be because AI collapses tomorrow, with all its inefficiency and theft and planet-harming), we can build for ordinary cloud load, sustainable power, and a general win-win for everybody, not just billionaires pushing AI.

Replying to @⁨HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu⁩

@HennaVirkkunen

Respectfully, please don't do this.

GenAI/LLM is a technological dead end like asbestos or blockchain. It will accelerate the climate crisis, deprive communities of energy and deskill the people who use it, causing far more damage than utility. The damage will be long-lasting, people in the future will curse us for going down this path.

The money would be far better spent on other areas of data sovereignty.

Replying to @⁨HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu⁩

@HennaVirkkunen AI is basically the digital version of gasoline… Do NOT do encourage those dependencies.

For automobiles the state happily built roads all over the place, and now we can barely travel sustainably. We can’t get rid of the cars because politicians did not prioritise trains and sustainable alternatives. DO NOT do the same with the AI. Keep the digital economy sustainable, and for god’s sake do not copy the unsustainable US.

#predictions #slop #EU

Replying to @⁨HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu⁩

@HennaVirkkunen

Who told you, that there is a "need" for Europe to "become an AI continent"? Google? Microsoft? Nvidia? CEO ranks with no clue, what they are talking about? Investors? Lobbyists?

Europe has to become
- CO2 emissions neutral
- more social
- more educated

I recommend you to study diverse papers that are not promoted by interested parties, but written by scientists.

Neutral networks are NOT Turing complete - and as such there is no singularity in view, regardless what Sam 1/

Replying to @⁨HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu⁩

@HennaVirkkunen I'm openning the call for the AI Gigafactories to fuck right off.

- LLM is a technological deadend,
- LLMs are built in deeply immoral and largely illegal manner with stealing peoples work without their consent,
- It's elitist, closing that stolen knowledge behind subscription that poorer people won't be able to pay,
- Those gigafactories gussle up an ungodly amount of energy that should be used by the people, moving the goalpost of only ecological energy production further away,
- Calling them gigafactories is the biggest lie since they provide only a really small amount of work places for highly trained people.
- What are the chances that those gigafactories will be used in some degree by companies that use technology to support palestinian genocide? I guess high.

Replying to @⁨HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu⁩

@HennaVirkkunen Which social-practical usage do AI gigafactories have - do they lower the cost of living for EU citizens? Nope, they do the complete opposite by being energy hungry blackholes bumping up energy and water prices.

Do they create jobs? Nope, they destroy more jobs and create an issue a future generation will suffer. Since CEOs replace entry level jobs with AI, there will be no senior workers when Gen X leaves the job market

Do they create profit? Only for shell firms and tax fraud

Replying to @⁨HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu⁩

@HennaVirkkunen Seriously… reconsider this.

You're already fighting wildfires on a scale similar to that which devastated Canberra almost 25 years ago. Bordeaux, France is literally getting roasted as I type this, and it's only a matter of time before leaf litter gets hoovered up by that firestorm weather system and starts firebombing the place.

Massive heat generating facilities like "AI" datacentres Will Only Make This Worse!

Replying to @⁨HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu⁩

@HennaVirkkunen AI-datakeskukset ovat helvetinmoinen syöpä: ne ahmivat sähköä ja vettä ilman, että tuottavat yhteiskunnalle juuri mitään oikeaa arvoa. Samalla ne jauhavat alleen taidetta, kulttuuria ja ihmisten luovuutta, kun kaikki pitää korvata halvalla, sieluttomalla tekoälysisällöllä. Koko touhu on vitun kestämätöntä, eikä sitä pitäisi juhlia edistyksenä vaan pitää varoittavana esimerkkinä siitä, mihin ahneus voi johtaa.

Replying to @⁨HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu⁩

@HennaVirkkunen What an absolutely horrendous thing to be pleased about. "AI" is worse than CFCs, tetraethyl lead, and thalidomide combined. The pro-AI crowd all sound like drug addicts and cultists when they aren't obvious grifters, racists, and fascists. It's awful for the environment, causes what amounts to brain damage in its users, it relies on stolen works, and is extraordinarily damaging to society as a whole. Why in the hell would you want to invest in such an insane venture?

Replying to @⁨HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu⁩

@HennaVirkkunen
May I suggest a cheaper option? Invest in VW diesel gigafactories. It will have the same climate effects, and we already have the technology, where as with AI we would be starting from scratch unless we end up buying American or Chinese, missing the point of digital sovereignty.

And the result may be useful (if we can still find diesel) in the post AI collapse Mad Max style climate hellscape you seem to be going all in on.

Replying to @⁨HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu⁩

@HennaVirkkunen seriously, right in the middle of the worst heatwaves SO FAR, with an upcoming even bleaker future, with half of Europe LITERALLY ON FIRE, the EU is going to donate billions to some of most climate-impacting and useless industries? Where did any of you get the idea that that was a smart thing to do?

How about you invest that money into gaining independence from the oil industry, given how impactful that has been already even in purely financial terms?

euronews.com/2026/05/30/clean-

Clean energy saved EU €51 billion in 2025 by cutting fossil fuel imports - as solar leads the wayeuronewsEU saved over €50 billion in 2025 by lowering fossil fuel importsInvesting in renewables has also ensured greater energy security at a moment when the war on Iran is destabilising supplies and forcing up costs.

Replying to @⁨HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu⁩

Amnesty InternationalUnlawful by design: Exposing the human rights costs of generative AI - Amnesty InternationalThis briefing examines how standalone generative AI systems, based on unlawful web scraping, are in conflict with international human rights law (IHRL) and standards through their design, development and deployment. While these technologies promise sophisticated automation and efficiency, they rely on data collection and model training practices that abuse privacy rights, enable discrimination, and threaten […]

Replying to @⁨HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu⁩

Attempting to rebrand your AI datacentres as "gigafactories" is an impressively bad way to announce this mistake. They are not factories. They do not manufacture anything. They run software, and they soak up surplus investment capital and other resources which are for some reason in need of burning.

People of the recent past and the recent future alike would have a hard time understanding how anyone could think that "Europe becoming an AI Continent" is a phrase that could be taken seriously by anyone.

Replying to @⁨HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu⁩

@HennaVirkkunen

So, just to confirm: you observed the US become dominated by billionaires and exploitative companies who are throwing trillions or dollars at technology that provides marginal (at best) benefits to society and entrenches their power, and your reaction was 'the EU should do that too!'?

For comparison, the amount that you're burning on this is more than twice as much as you'd need for the EU to build a competitive range of memory-safe sovereign CPUs from microcontroller up to server class devices and port most open-source software to run on them. This would reduce the attack surface for all EU infrastructure significantly and provide strong sovereignty guarantees.

Can you share how you did a cost-benefit calculation and decided that chasing a big-tech fad was the best return on investment for the bloc?

Replying to @⁨HennaVirkkunen@ec.social-network.europa.eu⁩

@HennaVirkkunen the nuclear power station Romania had to shut down due to lack of water provides 1.3GW; 20% of the nation's electricity, or enough for 1 or 2 large AI data centers. These things are opportunities to send huge amounts of money out of the EU to import hardware that will be worthless within 3 years and will consume obscene amounts of power in the meantime