posted in Technology
Codeberg bans vibe coded projects
cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1279028/codeberg-bans-vibe-coded-projects
Relevant .
blog.codeberg.org/protecting-our-floss-commons-from-llms.htmlposted in Technology
Codeberg bans vibe coded projects
cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1279028/codeberg-bans-vibe-coded-projects
Relevant .
blog.codeberg.org/protecting-our-floss-commons-from-llms.htmlReplying to @beep@piefed.world
A repo host that can remove your repo at any moment because someone can accuse your code of being “vibe coded” is not a repo host I’d trust. It shouldn’t matter how good, bad, or A.I. written your code is. It’s a hosting platform.
Replying to @GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
The main argument is due to copyright issues of LLM generated code. Github will happily remove repos which violated copyright laws. It makes sense that Codeberg doesn’t want to host code which may be violating copyright law.
Replying to @kayazere@feddit.nl
Just one problem with that: Every piece of work - code or otherwise, made by a human or not - may violate copyright law. There really is no way to know without actually checking against all other works (which you can’t because you don’t have access to all of them).
What GitHub does is what a sane person would do: React to claims. They just assume that what they get uploaded isn’t violating copyright until someone claims otherwise. And as it is literally impossible to actually know, that is the only sane way to approach this problem apart from just not hosting other people’s stuff at all.