posted in Technology
Anthropic: Our position on open-weights models
www.anthropic.com/news/position-open-weights-models
www.anthropic.comOur position on open-weights modelsAnthropic CEO Dario Amodei on open-weights modelswww.anthropic.comOur position on open-weights modelsAnthropic CEO Dario Amodei on open-weights models
Replying to @inari@piefed.zip
This guy is full of shit.
Let me rephrase his points:
- We can surveil, CCP should not.
- We can steal data, others cannot.
- We can dominate the world, others cannot.
Who the fuck gives Anthropic the right to use all that training data for their model?! And if other companies distill their models, THEY are to be protected by laws?! Cry me a fucking river.
Replying to @712@discuss.tchncs.de
Hasn’t the output from LLM already been ruled ineligible for copyright protection?
In most countries, the output of a single prompt will not be copyrightable. However, once someone starts arranging the output into something more, then copyright can be applied.
Overall, it depends on the country, but in some they are asking their legislators for clarification. Many are trying to apply pre-existing copyright laws to LLMs.
The U.S. Copyright Office wrote up a report about this and included a list of how other countries are handling it.
https://www.copyright.gov/ai/Copyright-and-Artificial-Intelligence-Part-2-Copyrightability-Report.pdf