SocialMediaRefugee

Sometimes to block an obnoxious user I have to go to old reddit to see the option.

CEO, “It will pay off because I’m the visionary.”

You could say anything is human driven if you follow the thread far enough. I’d say if an automated process is cranking out hundreds of requests per minute then even though someone turned it on it still falls under a bot process. There is no human actually monitoring each request or interacting with it.

I want the bots to start scamming each other now.

Oh man, he is prime romance scam bait.

I think the bigger issue is 65+ guys perving on girls young enough to be their daughters. Old guys who think they are still 25 and have game.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm

It reminds me of backup beepers on construction vehicles. Ever work on a busy construction site? It is nonstop beeping from every direction. Your brain eventually blocks it out.

For mine replacing the roller belt would require replacing the entire head. So damn wasteful.

I wonder how it handles things like protected software code? Repairable probably would mean buying an electronics module worth more than the device.

I got banned because mods use automated moderation and auto bans.

Just ask a human for review…oh right

So instead of continuing a project that could cure diseases and help understand human biology they’ll focus on a system I use for asking questions like “What adhesive is best to attaching siding trim?”

The radio was originally imagined to be a public education and cultural broadcast system. Instead it broadcast Amos and Andy.

I’d go in with an abacus and a notepad.

I’m going to need to see this for research purposes.

Open up junk data subreddits

I wonder if it will be possible to have antique cars from this period on. With all of the software in them they’d have to release the source code or decompile it to keep them on the road.

Fire Larry and sell his stock and his yachts and you’ll be in the black again.

Their way around it is they say that the border crossing technically isn’t 100% normal US territory and therefore some constitutional rights are suspended under the concept of “sovereign self-protection”. You could then say any law in the US could be used to justify this concept, in fact it was used to forcibly intern thousands of Japanese and Japanese-Americans during ww2.

He was targeted for purely political reasons, the cop-city environmental protest in Atlanta GA, and I’m wondering why the border officials were even aware of them. Is there some sort of “we don’t like what you think” list run by the gov?

His device was threatened with seizure even though he posed no threat, no visible threat or spoken one, no suspicion of a crime, and they had no idea what the contents were. His 5th Amendment rights were violated by the threat to seize it. They want to establish a precedent, that the very existence of a possibility of criminal contents, regardless of any reason to suspect any, is sufficient for search and seizure. Based on this a little kid deleting the contents of their ipad would be a crime.