abbadon420

No, you’re a mediocre browser

Not for investors that only look at absolute numbers.

I have routed duckduckgo.com to noai.duckduckgo.com on my computer

My account is a year old and I switched from lemm.ee a week or so before it shut down.

Lies! There’s also star trek

I hear a lot of good things about OpenBSD

I have premium family, but the only ads I hear are the ones that creaters put in themselves. I don’t mind those as much.

Edit: what joe said

If you want to get mad about possible plans that have not yet been made, you need the increasingly rare gift of foresight

I don’t think so. No average blue collar worker I know hates AI. They think its a fun, free toy.

One of us! One of us! One of us!

Are we considered “normal people” though?

Because it’s funny

They’re basically traffic cams, right? So it’s probably a Winona Ryder

I learned that. But Arch has an image of being super high maintenance and hard to install, like compiling linux back in the day. Totally invalid image, but it still persists. Anyways, I’m gonna try archinstall in my summer vacation.

Yes, without fluff and strict outlines, best is an actual template… But the prompts you give, are most easily given as if you’re talking to a 20 yo junior. Or maybe even better a 10 yo junior.

To be fair, talking to a chatbot like it’s a human, is a very effective way of getting the most useful responses out of them.

Holy shit, that is so fucking stupid. This has so much potential. This is such an anti-human pattern.

I do use this some times for pair programming. Share screen over a teams call and share mouse permission. But I do this on windows. I’ve never done this on linux with (or without) wayland, but now I’m curious.

You might accidentally shoot the (white) kid of some rich parent.

What are you on about? This is about how universities have a hard time managing AI use and misuse by students. Have they sown those AI tools?

The essence of an academic paper is that a student shows that they have learned all the goals that were set for that course or courses. If a student lets tgere paper be generated by AI, they can not prove that they have learned those goals. That is why universitues have (or should have) strict AI guidelines, so that students know which kinds of use are allowed and which are not.

This is a hard nut to crack. Of course you will see overfitting and underfitting until someone somewhere fimds a universal approach. I personally think AI-detection tools are shit, but you cannot fault universities for trying it. My university handles AI fraud manually, with a committe. That is very labor intensive. We only have a couple hundred students, but if you have thousands, it quickly becomes impossible.