PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

sanitation@sanitation@lemmy.today
⁨2⁩d

Woman Calls Out Doctor Wearing Smart Glasses During Consultation Where She Had To Take Off Her Clothes: 'They Need To Be Banned'

www.fashiontimes.co.uk/patient-privacy-concerns-meta-smart-glasses-1762492
Meta GlassesFashion timesWoman Calls Out Doctor Wearing Smart Glasses During Consultation Where She Had To Take Off Her Clothes: 'They Need To Be Banned'A woman's discomfort with a doctor wearing smart glasses during a consultation has sparked debate over privacy and the use of camera-equipped technology in healthcare settings.
34101128
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
jafra@jafra@slrpnk.net
⁨2⁩d

Replying to @⁨sanitation@lemmy.today⁩

I am confused. Why is this even up for debate? Why are we even putting up with people trying to debate this?

5000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Captain Aggravated@captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works
⁨2⁩d

Replying to @⁨jafra@slrpnk.net⁩

Something something first amendment.

3000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
MBech@MBech@feddit.dk
⁨2⁩d

Replying to @⁨captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works⁩

First amendment only protects you from being persecuted by the government. Being ostracized, shamed and unfortunately attacked in the middle of the night by anonomous people isn’t against the first amendment.

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Echo Dot@echodot@feddit.uk
⁨1⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

It also doesn’t apply outside the US (there’s a whole planet out there guys) so regardless of the nuance of its construction, it isn’t relevant here anyway.

⁨Aug⁩ ⁨13⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨11:19⁩en
1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
bugbear@bugbear@lemmy.sdf.org
⁨1⁩d

Replying to an earlier post

thanks @MBech@feddit.dk and @echodot@feddit.uk, I was about reply these two points and then saw your replies.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs