PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

eicker@eicker@lemmy.world
⁨19⁩d

Thoughts on "Open" Models: The debate focuses on balancing open and closed models, with cost and geopolitical considerations influencing the push for open weight AI.

spyglass.org/open-weight-ai-models/
SpyglassThoughts on "Open" ModelsThe open letter on open weights feels familiar yet different...
21036
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
eicker@eicker@lemmy.world
⁨19⁩d

Replying to @⁨eicker@lemmy.world⁩

Funny how »open is dangerous« only became the dominant narrative once Chinese models caught up: If your competitive moat depends on governments blocking free alternatives instead of building better products, maybe your moat isn’t technology at all.

2000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
zwerg@zwerg@feddit.org
⁨19⁩d

Replying to @⁨eicker@lemmy.world⁩

I don’t about your business, but we’ve had LOT of conversations about how much we trust these models. Not just about data egress, but on what they are trained to do/not to do - Chinese or not.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
eicker@eicker@lemmy.world
⁨18⁩d

Replying to @⁨zwerg@feddit.org⁩

Absolutely. Trust isn’t binary, and it isn’t unique to Chinese models either. Every (frontier) model reflects the incentives, values and constraints of whoever built it. That’s exactly why competition matters.

⁨Jul⁩ ⁨27⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨09:19⁩en
0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs