now introducing C--, it's C but slightly worse
Replying to @mjdxp@labyrinth.zone
@mjdxp this doesn't make sense. Language only slightly worse than C should be called C+, and I'd expect C-- to be a lot better
Replying to @mjdxp@labyrinth.zone
@mjdxp this doesn't make sense. Language only slightly worse than C should be called C+, and I'd expect C-- to be a lot better