mojofrododojo: “Bullshit, voyeurism is a felony in most states. In…” — Plamenu

posted in Technology

sanitation@sanitation@lemmy.today

Woman Calls Out Doctor Wearing Smart Glasses During Consultation Where She Had To Take Off Her Clothes: 'They Need To Be Banned'

www.fashiontimes.co.uk/patient-privacy-concerns-meta-smart-glasses-1762492

Fashion timesWoman Calls Out Doctor Wearing Smart Glasses During Consultation Where She Had To Take Off Her Clothes: 'They Need To Be Banned'A woman's discomfort with a doctor wearing smart glasses during a consultation has sparked debate over privacy and the use of camera-equipped technology in healthcare settings.

jafra@jafra@slrpnk.net

Replying to @⁨sanitation@lemmy.today⁩

I am confused. Why is this even up for debate? Why are we even putting up with people trying to debate this?

Captain Aggravated@captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works

Replying to @⁨jafra@slrpnk.net⁩

Something something first amendment.

mojofrododojo@mojofrododojo@lemmy.world

Replying to @⁨captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works⁩

Bullshit, voyeurism is a felony in most states. Invading someone’s privacy isn’t covered by the first fucking amendment you dolt.

⁨Aug⁩ ⁨12⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨22:35⁩en

Captain Aggravated@captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works

Replying to @⁨mojofrododojo@lemmy.world⁩

I answered why it’s still debatable. Debating is free speech.

mojofrododojo@mojofrododojo@lemmy.world

Replying to @⁨captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works⁩

anything is debatable, it doesn’t make it legal or ethical. creeping on people with hidden cameras is fucking gross and needs even more regulation.

Captain Aggravated@captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works

Replying to @⁨mojofrododojo@lemmy.world⁩

Correct. Doctor should have his head put through the wall. Use a stud finder so you don’t miss.