CodeFloe@codefloe@social.tchncs.de

Now that #codeberg has manifested their anti-AI view with a 70% in favor vote (codeberg.org/Codeberg/org/pull), we're happy to welcome (once again) all the people which have to/want to move their repositories off Codeberg but still want to stay on a Forgejo-based instance.

Bonus: on top you'll get better uptime, faster site responses and faster CI runners - all for free :)

tl;dr: after this ToU change, keeping AI-generated code on Codeberg would violate these and repositories will be in danger of deletion.

#codeberg #codefloe #giveUpGitHub

Summary card of an issue titled "Proposal Assembly 2026: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusions" in repository Codeberg/orgCodeberg.orgProposal Assembly 2026: ToU extension to prohibit LLM-extrusionsHere is the proposed addition for the ToU that @Gusted and I agreed on post-assembly for the upcoming membership vote. 🙏 The discussion for this proposal is available for Codeberg e. V. members in the forum: https://forum.codeberg.org/d/139-resolutions-for-assembly-on-codeberg-taking-a-stand-a...
CodeFloe@codefloe@social.tchncs.de

Replying to @⁨silverpill@mitra.social⁩

@silverpill No stance - i.e. All good.

Crypto is a technology in the first place and nothing that should be banned or moderated on the code level. Many people use it in a very positive way.

Abuse and bad acting is always possible and might surely happen in this sector more frequently than elsewhere - but that is actor-related and nothing of our business hosting source code.

If someone would use crypto projects on our CI to act questionable or perform harmful actions - this would be another case then.