The point still stands… that does not look like a GTX 1650? Unless someone swapped the cooler on it, that seems like a fake card or hacked firmware to me
xthexder
Check out my open source game engine! strayphotons.net git.sw0.com/frustra/strayphotons
I have been developing this engine on and off for over 10 years, and still have big plans.
Replying to @lemmyvore@feddit.nl
This isn’t about speed cameras, it’s about “safety” surveillance cameras. No laws have to be broken. Evading Flock isn’t illegal
Replying to @whoisearth@lemmy.ca
It’s only clean when you compare it to the fossil fuel alternatives it replaces like coal.
Replying to a post on lemmy.world
How about…
- ICE kidnapping citizens off the street
- DOGE dismantling government services
- The blatant scams and rug pulls Trump is pulling to rob taxpayers
- Companies getting billions of tax breaks to build AI datacenters nobody wants
I could go on…
Replying to a post on lemmy.world
Seriously? Flock is the only problem you have with America right now? You must be living under a rock.
Replying to @NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
I think you’re confusing your units for power vs energy. 3.5GWh (Gigawatt-hours) says nothing about the size of a power plant without also providing a time period that energy was generated in. You likely mean 3.5GW (Gigawatts), which is a measure of instantaneous power (in this case peak power). A 3.5GW plant generates 3.5GWh in 1 hour.
Replying to @Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml
I think you’re missing the space after > for the quote syntax.
Like this
Replying to @iopq@lemmy.world
Unless you’re renting a GPU instance, I highly doubt your VPS is in one of these 1GW AI facilities, they’re mostly used privately by companies like Anthropic and OpenAI, or other companies specifically renting AI training capacity.
AWS has had existing datacenters for decades now and while they’re quite large, they’re a fraction of the size the AI industry is demanding. They were also built before regulations started getting changed in favor of more datacenters, so they’re actually following the zoning rules about noise, water, and power consumption.
Replying to @iopq@lemmy.world
The type of datacenters running lemmy and other services are nothing like the AI datacenters being built. Some of the AI datacenters are literally 1000x bigger in terms of power consumption than existing data center buildings are using. They’re trying to build a 10 Gigawatt AI datacenter in Ohio, and it will need its own power station to run it.
I own my server and colocate it, and it’s sitting in what looks like a normal office building. You would never know from the sidewalk directly outside that there’s a hub for AWS and Google Cloud right there. The amount of cooling required is small enough they can just use regular air conditioning units on the roof, and none of this evaporating water crap.
Replying to @boatswain@infosec.pub
This being partially right is probably exactly how it ended up in the training data. But AI is too dumb to understand which parts are relevant/important.
Replying to @Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
Polarization is kind of just magic. Which means these sunglasses might actually require mana points to use.
Replying to @mildseason@sopuli.xyz
Well, it really depends on how the notification is sent. Most people don’t have push notifications set up on YouTube, so the spike wouldn’t be crazy high there. Even a few 1000 people requesting a video at once could overwhelm a single server’s bandwidth though.
I completely guessed at the 2% number if they were on another platform that sent out emails or push notifications. But I’m sure they’d also lose a huge chunk of those subscribers when moving platforms.
Replying to @mildseason@sopuli.xyz
25M subscribers means 25M people getting notified to come watch a video all at once. They could easily end up with a half million requests to buffer the new video all at once, and that would take down anything short of a full CDN to handle local geo-caching. It wouldn’t be cheap to handle the burst loads of new releases.
Replying to @bluGill@fedia.io
It just means they’ve been caught again.
Replying to @berno@lemmy.world
I view this more like a Pandora’s Box situation rather than a genie. I agree though, we’ll never be able to go back to what it was like before LLMs, and that makes me sad. We just have to live with it now.
Replying to @turmacar@lemmy.world
It can definitely come in handy. Although I went as far as leaving a wireless Zigbee button by my couch so I can dim the lights or toggle power on my AV stuff without getting up. I haven’t replaced the battery yet, and it’s been 2 years.
Replying to @melfie@lemmy.zip
In the same line of thinking, this is why I hand wash my car, because the automatic car wash either does a bad job (touchless) or will scratch the paint up all over (brushes). Many people don’t care very much about their cars though, so why put in the effort?
I find unreliable tools to be one of the most infuriating parts of my job, and unfortunately my entire job has effectively pivoted to spending all day babysitting an AI that frequently ignores instructions and can’t learn without a ton of expensive fine-tuning training.
I don’t let AI touch any of my personal code I care about, and with how much of the code at work is written by AI, it’s pretty demoralizing. Why put in any effort designing something if it’s just going to get blown away by a coworker’s agent the next day?
Arguing with the AI over why its code review is wrong is also a whole other part of my day now…
Replying to @njordomir@lemmy.world
Personally I went out of my way to put physical buttons around my house so I can use Home Assistant automations without talking. It has the added bonus that guests can just turn the lights on and off without a tutorial.
Replying to @TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
Just to add to this… some of the videos on YouTube are actual full ads. The content itself is an ad, so what should Google do? Ban YouTube Premium users from watching those videos? (I’m thinking like old Superbowl ads)
I don’t see how Google could possibly make a determination of what is and isn’t an ad, when Sponsor Block can barely figure out the categories. I doubt we could expect creators to self-identity sponsored segments, and I could easily see that system being abused.
People get really creative with their sponsors sometimes, doing entire skits to try and get you to keep watching. There’s no clear way to determine what an ad even is when it’s uploaded by the creator.
Replying to @DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip
Yeah… if the strategy ends up giving people you don’t want in office extra votes, that just seems completely backwards. It just increases the chances that the worst candidate gets elected, which to me sounds worse than just having the wrong party win.