PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in
PPlamenu
HomeTrendingLive feedsPeopleGroupsRulesStaff
Sign in

posted in Technology

FoxtrotDeltaTango@FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works
⁨13⁩d

The AI bubble could burst — and take the economy with it - The Boston Globe

cross-posted from: lemmy.world/post/50104484

www.bostonglobe.com/2026/07/30/opinion/ai-bubble-economy-regulations/
BostonGlobe.comThe AI bubble could burst — and take the economy with it - The Boston GlobeWashington is loosening financial safeguards just as risks tied to artificial intelligence are mounting.
3410373
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
eleitl@eleitl@lemmy.zip
⁨12⁩d

Replying to @⁨FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works⁩

Not could. It’s a mathematical certainty that it will. Barring a breakthrough miracle – fat chance.

3000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Valmond@Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
⁨12⁩d

Replying to @⁨eleitl@lemmy.zip⁩

An AI breakthrough has nothing to do with LLMs, it’s like saying the auto industry will collapse except if there is an AI breakthrough that saves it.

⁨Aug⁩ ⁨3⁩, ⁨2026⁩, ⁨07:10⁩en
1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
eleitl@eleitl@lemmy.zip
⁨11⁩d

Replying to @⁨Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com⁩

That’s what a breakthrough means. But obviously all the funding is burned up in more DCs with incremental iteration on the same design. So the bubble has to pop for real innovation. But I think this coming AI winter will be permanent, as things are very visibly falling apart.

1000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs
Valmond@Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
edited⁨11⁩d

Replying to @⁨eleitl@lemmy.zip⁩

Well yeah, but my statement is true anyways IMO. Deep neural networks are unchanged since the eighties I guess, and again IMO it’s not they who need/can have a breakthrough, doubly especially since nobody seems to be working on anything else than “bigger datasets” and profiling and such.

0000
Open original page
BoostsQuotesFavs