I saw this elsewhere and thought I’d repost here. One lab’s policy on AI use in academic writing.
“The only reason you’ll ever need to not write with AI”
https://www.carlsonlab.bio/thoughts/the-only-reason-youll-ever-need-not-to-write-with-ai
I saw this elsewhere and thought I’d repost here. One lab’s policy on AI use in academic writing.
“The only reason you’ll ever need to not write with AI”
https://www.carlsonlab.bio/thoughts/the-only-reason-youll-ever-need-not-to-write-with-ai
Replying to @steveroyle@biologists.social
@steveroyle
My daughter (biologist) advises her undergrad students that if they want to use AI they should only use it for drawing diagrams.
In the light of the recent revelation that AI can produce near-identical output for multiple people, even that seems risky for published papers if you want to be sure you’re safe from plagiarism accusations.
Replying to @KimSJ@mastodon.social
@KimSJ but.... there're millions of tools, which will generate you a diagram from data, 100% accurately and for a fraction of a cost... why use imprecise-by-design AI models...
@mo @steveroyle
I think you’re thinking of *charts*, which are only a subset of ‘diagrams’. But yes, such tools are better for charts, which covers a large proportion of use cases.